3 ms·
Absolutely, Roblox should not exist given the problems it caused. Goes well beyond scamming kids to work for scrip. =3
by Joel_Mckay 11mo ago
Absolutely, Roblox should not exist given the problems it caused.
Goes well beyond scamming kids to work for scrip. =3
- daedrdev 11mo agoDespite how little they pay their game devs, offering like 20% I think, Roblox itself continues to make a loss so there case that they are scamming their devlopers isn't the strongest
- poly2it 11mo agoRoblox is making a loss? How is this possible? I've always thought it was perfectly maximined.
- deleted 11mo ago[deleted]
- daedrdev 11mo agoMost their users are don’t pay, their services are all hosted by themselves, development of tooling for games and the platform itself is costly, legal issues, etc.
- Joel_Mckay 11mo agoMust be awkward discussing how "AI" is supposed to solve the Roblox "problems". GTFO, no kid under 16 should be on that platform unsupervised. The feds should have section 7 that firm years ago. =3
- daedrdev 11mo agoRoblox is hiring unlike other companies trying to replace everyone with ai.
- Joel_Mckay 11mo agoYou didn't understand why "problems" was in quotes. I refuse to explain that to you, as you are likely still a kid. =3
- daedrdev 11mo agoI am not a kid and have a job =3 Just say what you mean already. It’s not somehow better discussion when you hide your point behind layers of misdirection.
- Joel_Mckay 11mo ago"A chapter 7 bankruptcy terminates the company's operations and takes the company completely out of business." It is essentially a judges forced death-sentence for a corporation. An appropriate solution given Roblox manipulative behavior targeting kids, and a pattern of administrative negligence on the platform. Spend 5 minutes searching, and the history of the platform "problems" is trivially exposed. Kids <16 should not be on there unsupervised, and there are lots of other better-quality games around people can play that offer far less "problems". =3