> This strategy doesn't make sense. What was the end goal? To have the other person keep buying new computers. I would assume it was to interfere with the othe

> This strategy doesn't make sense. What was the end goal? To have the other person keep buying new computers. I would assume it was to interfere with the other student's research. That other person almost certainly had data on the destroyed computers that he either lost completely, or had to do extra work to recover when they failed.