3 ms·

OS software maintainers don't like maintaining legacy ugly APIs forever and want to refactor/remove legacy code to keep themselves sane and the project maintain

• superkuh 10mo ago
  Yep. Or you can see it as, "This software doesn't really care about the users and their use cases. It prioritizes making things look pretty and easier on the dev side over maintaining functionality." Or in the worse but fairly common OSS case, CADT, but that doesn't seem to apply in this context.
• LegionMammal978 10mo ago
  Every public API change is a cost on the user: for an extreme example, if every library I ever used renamed half its APIs every year to align with the latest ontology, then there would hardly be any point in saving my scripts, since I'd have to be constantly rewriting them all. Of course, the reality is hardly ever as bad as that, but I'd say having to deal with trivial API changes is a reasonable basis for a user to dislike a given project or try to avoid using it. It's up to the maintainers how friendly they want to be toward existing user code, and whether they pursue mitigating options like bundling migrations into less-common bigger updates.
• mxey 10mo ago
  It’s like 5 lines of code https://github.com/urllib3/urllib3/pull/3732/files https://github.com/urllib3/urllib3/pull/3732/files