3 ms·
This is actually a major nitpick. If this "study" is this sloppy, what else isn't quite true?
by fortran77 11mo ago
This is actually a major nitpick. If this "study" is this sloppy, what else isn't quite true?
- lkbm 11mo agoThe study doesn't mention tailpipes (afiact). This press release/article does. Don't dismiss scientists because journalists reporting their findings incorrectly.
- theurerjohn3 11mo agoI am a little confused, why would sloppiness in the media release (the article that uses the word tailpipe), have anything to do with sloppiness in the study, which the above comment clearly highlights is about PM2.5, not specifically tailpipe emissions? Are Yale's media releases typically done by the people who do the study?
- acdha 11mo agoThe study isn’t sloppy, and I would highly suggest reading it before casting aspersions at the authors: https://www.nature.com/articles/s44407-025-00037-2 https://www.nature.com/articles/s44407-025-00037-2