This seems like a really odd take. What you're effectively advocating for here is for people not to see information about publicly funded services, because ulti

This seems like a really odd take. What you're effectively advocating for here is for people not to see information about publicly funded services, because ultimately centralised for-profit services own user attention, & therefore govern what the majority of people see. > why not use a free social media outlet? This would be fine if people used free social media outlets. They don't. Short of banning private social media, I don't see what governments can do to change that.