3 ms·
That’s fair, but to me the “in Rust” part is the most relevant. I wanted to see how ergonomic it was to do such raw memory tweaking in the memory-safe systems p
by oersted 11mo ago
That’s fair, but to me the “in Rust” part is the most relevant. I wanted to see how ergonomic it was to do such raw memory tweaking in the memory-safe systems programming language.
- NoboruWataya 11mo agoBut they do pepper `unsafe` everywhere.
- iknowstuff 10mo agoAs you can see they're creating safe wrappers around the raw unsafe windows API which uphold the invariants. Microsoft should provide these as a crate.