2 ms·
Both sides say that voters who didn't vote for their favorite candidate because they are uneducated fools and deplorable. > If one campaign saturates communica
by WalterBright 11mo ago
Both sides say that voters who didn't vote for their favorite candidate because they are uneducated fools and deplorable.
> If one campaign saturates communication it drowns others, this is what money buys on political campaigns (especially in the US).
Carly Fiona is another example of a big spender that got trounced in the polls.
BTW, no matter how much campaign money is spent by socialist candidates, I will never vote for them. If all the candidates on the ballot are socialists, I will turn in my ballot with no vote on it. My vote is not for sale.
- piva00 11mo agoYou know about statistics and how population-wise aggregate data can be skewed given you know which levers to press and where, I don't know why you play dumb about money in politics being a massive influence. Nowhere is said "money buys YOUR vote", money does influence votes, it does influence people who are less educated (or less politically engaged) who watches ad after ad pushing the precise button they need to be pushed to tilt scales. I don't care about your view on socialist candidates, it doesn't pertain to this discussion whatsoever. People would vote for a socialist candidate who said the right stuff to them, that's just how the statistics work.