4 ms·
To implement a thread-safe sequential increment, you need locking. When you use locking, then it becomes a “non-universal” ID generator with arbitrary performan
by sedatk 11mo ago
To implement a thread-safe sequential increment, you need locking. When you use locking, then it becomes a “non-universal” ID generator with arbitrary performance impact.
Either it’s collision-prone or locking. Both are problematic in their own way.
It’s footguns all over while UUIDv7 simply exists.
- N_Lens 11mo agoThere is practically no need to have a thread-safe ULID generator that would be shared across threads/processes/hosts - a non-scenario that I cannot envision occurring in practice.