Thanks for followup and link. Interesting. IANAL: That court's decision was based on the contract w/ Flock. It does not move the needle wrt public records. I

Thanks for followup and link. Interesting. IANAL: That court's decision was based on the contract w/ Flock. It does not move the needle wrt public records. I may read the decision, testimony, and any amicus briefs. During the 00's, Wash Citizen's for Open Govt had a prominent blindspot wrt tension between privatization and public records (in the shape of Tony Nixon). I'm curious if they were involved with this case, and if their positions have matured.