4 ms·
This is... I'll go with "dystopian". If you're not sure you can properly explain an idea, you should think about it more deeply.
by i80and 10mo ago
This is... I'll go with "dystopian". If you're not sure you can properly explain an idea, you should think about it more deeply.
- jon-wood 10mo agoOr simply not participate in that conversation. It’s not obligatory to have an opinion on all subjects.
- zby 10mo agoI thought that the point was to post valuable thoughts - because it is interesting to read them. But now you suggest that it depends on how they were generated.
- 12_throw_away 10mo ago> post valuable thoughts This is neither the mechanism nor the goal of human communication, not even on the internet.
- jon-wood 10mo agoYeah, but if you're having to turn to a machine to compose your thoughts on a subject they're probably not that valuable. In an online community like this the interesting (not necessarily valuable) thoughts are the ones that come from personal experience, and raise the non-obvious points that an LLM is never going to come up with.
- zby 10mo agoWhy? This is like saying that you should not use a car - because you should walk. Sometimes yes - but as a general rule?
- filoeleven 10mo agoThink of HN as a pedestrian district, then. Cars are fine elsewhere. They don't belong here, it wasn't built for them.