3 ms·

> You read through all of that data and research, as told earlier, and haven't become an expert...? Yeah right. No need to be so modest with me. Be proud of you

by BobbyJo 11mo ago

> You read through all of that data and research, as told earlier, and haven't become an expert...? Yeah right. No need to be so modest with me. Be proud of your achievements! Okay. You seem upset, so I'll disengage. Have a great day!

9rx 11mo ago
Now you are under the impression that a computer screen is able to become upset? That's a new one.
- BobbyJo 11mo ago
  Are you claiming to be a computer screen now? Hard to believe, but you're the expert on computer screens I guess.
  - 9rx 11mo ago
    Perhaps it was wrong to assume. How about you describe what you see and then, from that, we can decide what it is that you are interacting with.
    - BobbyJo 11mo ago
      No thank you.
      - 9rx 11mo ago
        Embarrassed to admit that it does, in fact, look like a computer screen, huh?
        BobbyJo 11mo ago
        > Ackchyually, I am a computer screen. lololol Okay bud.
        deleted 11mo ago
        [deleted]
        9rx 11mo ago
        As valuable as that diversion no doubt was for you, we still haven't established from your data sources how many people are involved in R&D in a hobby/pleasure/necessity capacity and how that compares to those who have chosen to dedicate their lives towards it. If it is not in the data, you can say so, but it becomes impossible to know how the average person performs in R&D without it. Which then returns us to the original question: "Based on what?"
        BobbyJo 11mo ago
        You wait right there and I'll go right a paper for you.
        deleted 11mo ago
        [deleted]
        deleted 11mo ago
        [deleted]
        9rx 11mo ago
        > I'll go right a paper for you. Did it fall over?
        BobbyJo 10mo ago
        Dang, brain fart. I guess you win.
        9rx 10mo ago
        I appreciate you wanting to reorient the paper for me, but I wouldn't call that a win. I was fine with how it was already at rest. If anything, I lose, as the time you put into that was time not spent getting beck to me on the questions I have about the actual topic at hand.

by BobbyJo 11mo ago

9rx 11mo ago

Now you are under the impression that a computer screen is able to become upset? That's a new one.

BobbyJo 11mo ago
Are you claiming to be a computer screen now? Hard to believe, but you're the expert on computer screens I guess.
- 9rx 11mo ago
  Perhaps it was wrong to assume. How about you describe what you see and then, from that, we can decide what it is that you are interacting with.
  - BobbyJo 11mo ago
    No thank you.
    - 9rx 11mo ago
      Embarrassed to admit that it does, in fact, look like a computer screen, huh?
      - BobbyJo 11mo ago
        > Ackchyually, I am a computer screen. lololol Okay bud.
        deleted 11mo ago
        [deleted]
        9rx 11mo ago
        As valuable as that diversion no doubt was for you, we still haven't established from your data sources how many people are involved in R&D in a hobby/pleasure/necessity capacity and how that compares to those who have chosen to dedicate their lives towards it. If it is not in the data, you can say so, but it becomes impossible to know how the average person performs in R&D without it. Which then returns us to the original question: "Based on what?"
        BobbyJo 11mo ago
        You wait right there and I'll go right a paper for you.
        deleted 11mo ago
        [deleted]
        deleted 11mo ago
        [deleted]
        9rx 11mo ago
        > I'll go right a paper for you. Did it fall over?
        BobbyJo 10mo ago
        Dang, brain fart. I guess you win.
        9rx 10mo ago
        I appreciate you wanting to reorient the paper for me, but I wouldn't call that a win. I was fine with how it was already at rest. If anything, I lose, as the time you put into that was time not spent getting beck to me on the questions I have about the actual topic at hand.