3 ms·
This is the only reasonable take. It's not worth polluting human-only spaces, particularly top tier ones like HN, with generated content--even when it's accura
by sejje 11mo ago
This is the only reasonable take.
It's not worth polluting human-only spaces, particularly top tier ones like HN, with generated content--even when it's accurate.
Luckily I've not found a lot of that here. That which I do has usually been downvoted plenty.
Maybe we could have a new flag option, which became visible to everyone with enough "AI" votes so you could skip reading it.
- fwip 11mo agoI'd love to see that for article submissions, as well.
- manmal 11mo agoWhat LLM generate is an amalgamation of human content they have been trained on. I get that you want what actual humans think, but that’s also basically a weighted amalgamation. Real, actual insight, is incredibly rare and I doubt you see much of it on HN (sorry guys; I’ll live with the downvotes).
- dogleash 11mo agoI'm downvoting exclusively for your comment about downvotes.
- dinkleberg 11mo agoWhy do you suppose we come to HN if not for actual insight? There are other sites much better for getting an endless stream of weighted amalgamations of human content.
- ergonaught 11mo agoComing here for insight does not in any way demonstrate that genuine insight is actually widely available here.
- manmal 11mo agoIt’s obviously an amalgamation that’s weighted in favor of your interests.