3 ms·
I think the argument isn't that it is copyright violation so much as it is anticompetitive. Google is using its monopoly in search to disadvantage its competito
by thayne 10mo ago
I think the argument isn't that it is copyright violation so much as it is anticompetitive. Google is using its monopoly in search to disadvantage its competitors in serving ads (other websites).
But on the other hand, when the summaries are accurate (which they aren't always!) they can be beneficial to consumers, so it isn't obviously bad either.
- cubefox 10mo ago> I think the argument isn't that it is copyright violation so much as it is anticompetitive. Google is using its monopoly in search to disadvantage its competitors in serving ads (other websites). But every news website does the same when they summarize the news from other news websites. Which they do all the time.