3 ms·
I'll be honest, after seeing a nightmare situation where a smartring battery inflated and cut off circulation to a finger, I will never ever buy a ring with a
by gegtik 10mo ago
I'll be honest, after seeing a nightmare situation where a smartring battery inflated and cut off circulation to a finger, I will never ever buy a ring with a battery in it.
- Daneel_ 10mo agoI’d be interested to see a battery-less ring that uses the mechanical energy of the press to power a BLE transmitter to trigger voice input on a watch. I feel like it’s much safer, plus it has no fixed lifespan.
- skeledrew 10mo agoHow will a single press provide that much energy?
- BoredPositron 10mo agoPiezo
- skeledrew 10mo agoIt's a single press, which has to power the microphone for several seconds, and wireless connection to communicate with the sync device, even later if it isn't immediately available. In what way would piezo generate that much energy?
- Daneel_ 10mo ago> BLE transmitter to trigger voice input on a watch I suggesting triggering input on a watch, not voice recording on the ring. In my suggestion the ring would be a ‘dumb’ input device.
- skeledrew 10mo agoI see. However that misses the point of always having the function at hand, 24/7/365. There will be the off time when you remove the watch to charge it for instance, or times when it may be inconvenient to wear a watch. Your use case would be another product, likely with a different audience.
- _flux 10mo agoI suppose it would be possible to design the ring so that any pillowing would occur only in outwards expansion.
- rpdillon 10mo agoMentioned elsewhere: this is why they didn't go with a rechargeable battery.