> Totally ignoring the history of the field. What does that mean? "Others have called such tools AI" is argumentum ad populum and a fallacious argument. > Ign

> Totally ignoring the history of the field. What does that mean? "Others have called such tools AI" is argumentum ad populum and a fallacious argument. > Ignoring large and varied debates as to what these words mean. Lacking evidence of ChatGPT knowing or understanding things, that is the null hypothesis.