3 ms·
> "Nah, they are fine. They ate head of presidents office alive last week." That's the same guy who tried to take over that anti-corruption office. He would be
by perihelions 11mo ago
> "Nah, they are fine. They ate head of presidents office alive last week."
That's the same guy who tried to take over that anti-corruption office. He would be controlling it now, if it weren't for the massive country-wide protests about it. I'm not sure that they're doing fine.
Economist, July 2025:
> "On July 22nd the Rada, Ukraine’s parliament, passed a bill that would place the country’s two main anti-corruption bodies—NABU, which investigates wrongdoing, and SAPO, which prosecutes it—under the control of the presidency. This was not the work of rogue MPs. It was orchestrated from the top by President Volodymyr Zelensky and his all-powerful chief of staff, Andriy Yermak."
https://www.economist.com/leaders/2025/07/23/volodymyr-zelensky-has-made-a-strategic-blunder https://www.economist.com/leaders/2025/07/23/volodymyr-zelen... ( https://archive.is/kYh4w https://archive.is/kYh4w )
BBC, last week: "...was forced to U-turn after mass demonstrations",
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cz0nljm4y74o https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cz0nljm4y74o ("Andriy Yermak: How Zelensky's right-hand man fell from power" / "Fall of Zelensky's top aide - reboot for Kyiv or costly shake-up?")
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2025_anti-corruption_protests_in_Ukraine https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2025_anti-corruption_protests_...
- Muromec 11mo ago>That's the same guy who tried to take over that anti-corruption office. He would be controlling it now, if it weren't for the massive country-wide protests about it. I'm not sure that they're doing fine. Well, they won for now, that's what matters.