12 ms·

If you are looking for a serverless alternative to JetStream, check out https://s2.dev https://s2.dev Pros: unlimited streams with the durability of object sto

by shikhar 10mo ago

If you are looking for a serverless alternative to JetStream, check out https://s2.dev https://s2.dev Pros: unlimited streams with the durability of object storage – JetStream can only do a few K topics Cons: no consumer groups yet, it's on the agenda

embedding-shape 10mo ago
Have you tried running Jepsen against it?
- shikhar 10mo ago
  We do deterministic simulation testing https://s2.dev/blog/dst https://s2.dev/blog/dst https://s2.dev/blog/linearizability https://s2.dev/blog/linearizability We have also adopted Antithesis for a more thorough DST environment, and plan to do more with it. One day we will engage Kyle to Jepsen, too. I'm not sure when though.
  - Kinrany 10mo ago
    NATS claims to use Antithesis as well, so that's nothing comparatively speaking
  - embedding-shape 10mo ago
    I guess that's better than nothing. But now I'm unsure what your original comment was about, if your project doesn't use Jepsen for testing to "prove" it works fine, how is your project relevant to bring up on a submission about a Jepsen test of some other software? If everyone who was making a database/message queue/whatever distributed system shared their projects on every Jepsen submission, we'd never have any discussions about the actual software in question.
    - shikhar 10mo ago
      It seemed like the kind of Jepsen outcome where folks would be considering alternatives, but yeah maybe it was not appropriate to plug here.
pdimitar 10mo ago
I'm not seeing full self-hosting yet, and "Book a call" link is an instant nope for many techies. I understand that you need to make money. But you'll have to have a proper self-hosting offering with paid support as well before you're considered, at least by me. I'm not looking to have even more stuff in the cloud.
- shikhar 10mo ago
  The cloud offering is self-serve, no need to get on a call at all. An open source, self-hosted option is in progress https://github.com/s2-streamstore/s2?tab=readme-ov-file#s2-lite https://github.com/s2-streamstore/s2?tab=readme-ov-file#s2-l...
hmans 10mo ago
[dead]

by shikhar 10mo ago

embedding-shape 10mo ago

Have you tried running Jepsen against it?

shikhar 10mo ago
We do deterministic simulation testing https://s2.dev/blog/dst https://s2.dev/blog/dst https://s2.dev/blog/linearizability https://s2.dev/blog/linearizability We have also adopted Antithesis for a more thorough DST environment, and plan to do more with it. One day we will engage Kyle to Jepsen, too. I'm not sure when though.
- Kinrany 10mo ago
  NATS claims to use Antithesis as well, so that's nothing comparatively speaking
- embedding-shape 10mo ago
  I guess that's better than nothing. But now I'm unsure what your original comment was about, if your project doesn't use Jepsen for testing to "prove" it works fine, how is your project relevant to bring up on a submission about a Jepsen test of some other software? If everyone who was making a database/message queue/whatever distributed system shared their projects on every Jepsen submission, we'd never have any discussions about the actual software in question.
  - shikhar 10mo ago
    It seemed like the kind of Jepsen outcome where folks would be considering alternatives, but yeah maybe it was not appropriate to plug here.

pdimitar 10mo ago

I'm not seeing full self-hosting yet, and "Book a call" link is an instant nope for many techies. I understand that you need to make money. But you'll have to have a proper self-hosting offering with paid support as well before you're considered, at least by me. I'm not looking to have even more stuff in the cloud.

shikhar 10mo ago
The cloud offering is self-serve, no need to get on a call at all. An open source, self-hosted option is in progress https://github.com/s2-streamstore/s2?tab=readme-ov-file#s2-lite https://github.com/s2-streamstore/s2?tab=readme-ov-file#s2-l...

hmans 10mo ago

[dead]