3 ms·
I'm not trying to convince you, because well, you can't reason person out of a position that they didn't reason themselves into - this is your ideological conv
by SideburnsOfDoom 11mo ago
I'm not trying to convince you, because well, you can't reason person out of a position that they didn't reason themselves into - this is your ideological conviction, and you should own it and say it clearly rather than trying to slip it in sideways, but for other readers:
> European governments have so far adamantly refused again and again to reduce immigration
I do not recognise this as reality. This is not how these government have behaved, the ones that I have seen.
> indeed branded overt dissent as "racist"
If they keep calling your position racist, then well, it might be. I get that you're a "free thinker", freely falling into well-worn extremist tropes. Complaining about "the herd" where the problem surely lies for not letting you spread your "cultural and civilisational clash" belief.
But, it's just not convincing.
- mytailorisrich 11mo agoIt is quite an insulting reply especially when my previous comment was factual: The demographic trend is factual based on data. The high level of non-European immigration is a fact based on data and so is the refusal of Western European governments to stop it. What is unreasoned or ideological there? I am unsure what reality you live in. You can look at the stats in the UK to observe (not interpret) that successive governments have not reduced immigration even when they claimed that that was what their aim was. This holds in all other Western European countries. Unclear, too, about what is racist in any of that. This is bizarre, frankly. QED.