> I'm really struggling to believe that anyone would consider this a "coding success". The index_tiled.html version later in the article is what justifies the

> I'm really struggling to believe that anyone would consider this a "coding success". The index_tiled.html version later in the article is what justifies the success claim IMO, and is the version I think it would've made more sense to host. The currently hosted index.html just feels like a consequence of the author taking a scaled/compressed screenshot and asking Claude to produce an exact match.