3 ms·
40M. More than PubMed, which needed more than two decades to grow close to that number? One way or the other, somebody seems to be utter clueless.
by GuestFAUniverse 11mo ago
40M. More than PubMed, which needed more than two decades to grow close to that number?
One way or the other, somebody seems to be utter clueless.
- Jtsummers 11mo agoAs jjgreen pointed out, the submitter made a bizarrely editorialized version of the title that multiplied the title's number, 40, by a million to get their "40M" version of the title.
- riedel 11mo agoAlso bizarre to myself. i shortened Neural Network to 'ML' because NN did bot look right. '40 ML' somehow got '40M'. Could it be server side. Sorry, I did only check now.