4 ms·
do you have a better solution? as they would say, NATS is a terrible message bus system, but all the others are worse
by hurturue 10mo ago
do you have a better solution?
as they would say, NATS is a terrible message bus system, but all the others are worse
- adhamsalama 10mo agoAre RabbitMQ's durable queues worse?
- johncolanduoni 10mo agoPulsar can do most of what NATS can, but at a much higher cost in both compute and operations (though I haven’t seen a head-to-head of each with durability turned on), along with some simply different characteristics (like NATS being suitable for sidecar deployment). NATS is fantastic for ephemeral messaging, but some of this report is really concerning when JetStream has been shipping for years.