3 ms·

Springer retracts nearly 40 publications on 'bonkers' dataset

• jjgreen 10mo ago
  That's "40" rather than "40M"
  • riedel 10mo ago
    Yes, sorry this seems like it was some unintentional autocorrect
    • dang 10mo ago
      I think that was a bug at our end. Sorry! Fixed now.
• GuestFAUniverse 10mo ago
  40M. More than PubMed, which needed more than two decades to grow close to that number? One way or the other, somebody seems to be utter clueless.
  • Jtsummers 10mo ago
    As jjgreen pointed out, the submitter made a bizarrely editorialized version of the title that multiplied the title's number, 40, by a million to get their "40M" version of the title.
    • riedel 10mo ago
      Also bizarre to myself. i shortened Neural Network to 'ML' because NN did bot look right. '40 ML' somehow got '40M'. Could it be server side. Sorry, I did only check now.
• riedel 10mo ago
  Seems like I cannot edit the title. I think I posted '40 ML' and it went to 40M for some reason.