3 ms·
>That assumes the status quo ante was a meritocracy. No, it just assumes it was more of a meritocracy than actively hiring based on irrelevant guiding principl
by coldtea 11mo ago
>That assumes the status quo ante was a meritocracy.
No, it just assumes it was more of a meritocracy than actively hiring based on irrelevant guiding principles like counter-balancing historical wrongs.
A blind process would both be neutral to the ideology that caused the wrongs (racism and such bias) and based on far more meritocracy.
- stvltvs 11mo agoSounds like we kind of agree but you wouldn't include blind hiring under the label of DEI. Also, I wouldn't agree that historically hiring was more meritocratic before DEI programs.