2 ms·
No, you need to prove that it is not plagiarism when you use an LLM to produce a piece of code that you then claim as yours. You have the whole burden of proof
by jacquesm 11mo ago
No, you need to prove that it is not plagiarism when you use an LLM to produce a piece of code that you then claim as yours.
You have the whole burden of proof thing backwards.
- DangitBobby 11mo agoOh wild, I was operating under the assumption that the law requires you to prove that a law was broken, but it turns out you need to prove it wasn't. Thanks!