4 ms·
`jj workspace add ../project-name-2` vs `git worktree add ../project-name-2` Sorry, but I don't get the improvement.
by jandudulski 10mo ago
`jj workspace add ../project-name-2` vs `git worktree add ../project-name-2`
Sorry, but I don't get the improvement.
- bialpio 10mo agoThe author doesn't mention this as an improvement to git, just showcases that an equivalent feature exists in jj. This is useful to me, a jj noob that was not aware it's possible.
- baq 10mo agothere isn't any. it's just possible in jj, which does not have feature parity with git and probably doesn't aim to have it anytime soon, if ever (not a contributor, so please don't quote me)
- steveklabnik 10mo agoIt depends on what you mean by "feature parity." jj has some features git doesn't, and git has some features jj doesn't. That's likely to be the case into the future, for sure. There's also like, some features of git aren't features in jj, but that doesn't mean you can't do that stuff with jj, it just works differently. The index or stashes, for example. In a literal sense, that's not parity, but in a logical sense, it is.