4 ms·
A site in '96 would have been built largely with tables, not CSS. CSS didn't become a thing until a couple of years later. I know this because I'm still salty
by handedness 10mo ago
A site in '96 would have been built largely with tables, not CSS. CSS didn't become a thing until a couple of years later.
I know this because I'm still salty about the transition. For all of CSS's advantages, we lost something when we largely moved away from tables.
- chrisco255 10mo agoWe lost something for a time but flex box and CSS grid (which came more recently) are objectively better than tables.
- icommentedtoday 10mo agoHow are they objectively better? They seem way too complex for me
- yesitcan 10mo agoYou can still use tables.
- handedness 10mo agoOf course, as implied by, "we largely moved away from tables."