4 ms·
I honestly find it deceptive at first, given that it is not what is expected by the regular person Looking at the official EU commission statement, this is it
by amarcheschi 11mo ago
I honestly find it deceptive at first, given that it is not what is expected by the regular person
Looking at the official EU commission statement, this is it and I agree with it:
X's use of the ‘blue checkmark' for ‘verified accounts' deceives users. This violates the DSA obligation for online platforms to prohibit deceptive design practices on their services. On X, anyone can pay to obtain the ‘verified' status without the company meaningfully verifying who is behind the account, making it difficult for users to judge the authenticity of accounts and content they engage with. This deception exposes users to scams, including impersonation frauds, as well as other forms of manipulation by malicious actors. While the DSA does not mandate user verification, it clearly prohibits online platforms from falsely claiming that users have been verified, when no such verification took place.
- andsoitis 11mo agoSo if "verified" nomenclature and badging changed to "paid", that would resolve this problem in your mind?
- amarcheschi 11mo agoHeh, partially. While it would be better, a tick has imprinted the notion of something "official" that can't be bought regardless of the price. Maybe that would be enough for me but not for the EC