7 ms·

Sounds like FUD to me. All of the cases I’m familiar with actually say that violating TOS isn’t against CFAA. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Computer_Fraud_and_

Sounds like FUD to me. All of the cases I’m familiar with actually say that violating TOS isn’t against CFAA. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Computer_Fraud_and_Abuse_Act https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Computer_Fraud_and_Abuse_Act

garbagewoman 10mo ago
Familiar with the Aaron Swartz case?
- aspenmayer 10mo ago
  Yes, I’m familiar with the case. He was caught interfering with equipment on the MIT campus in order to additionally violate TOS of JSTOR, wasn’t he? He shouldn’t have expected to prevail in court, and I’m saddened by his decision to end his own life. That said, he did a whole lot more besides violating TOS, so I’m not sure how applicable his case is to the topic under discussion, strictly speaking.
  - garbagewoman 10mo ago
    The charge of computer fraud was based on the breaking of TOS for MIT and JSTOR
    - aspenmayer 10mo ago
      > The charge of computer fraud was based on the breaking of TOS for MIT and JSTOR He wasn’t convicted, so that’s not been proved to be against the law in this case, so it doesn’t support the argument you’re advancing in this thread.