4 ms·
The argument is over whether the challenge is identical with its spirit or with its statement. Patrick clearly failed the spirit of the challenge. He tried to
by adamtj 14y ago
The argument is over whether the challenge is identical with its spirit or with its statement. Patrick clearly failed the spirit of the challenge. He tried to exploit a loophole in the statement of the challenge. So what which is the actual challenge?
Actually, it doesn't matter. Patrick failed to complete the challenge as stated, which is important because he was exploiting a loophole in the statement. Technically, his files were smaller. But technically, he was required to send Mike his files and decompresser. Instead, he put them on his server and sent Mike their location. Mike then had to get the files. It goes both ways.
Finding loopholes, while clever, isn't terribly interesting.
- jd 14y ago> But technically, he was required to send Mike his files and decompresser. Instead, he put them on his server and sent Mike their location. Mike then had to get the files. It goes both ways. In that case Patrick could just argue he hadn't sent the files at all (since Mike refused to accept them by refusing to download them) and that therefore the bet was still on, so he can still send the files by email or whatever.