4 ms·
It is. 17 U.S. Code § 1201 - Circumvention of copyright protection systems
by immibis 11mo ago
It is. 17 U.S. Code § 1201 - Circumvention of copyright protection systems
- aspenmayer 11mo agoWell actually, it isn’t for individuals and certain groups, technically. Rooting/jailbreaking have had exemptions for many years now, on a three year basis which has seemingly been continually renewed, by the Librarian of Congress. Exemption to Prohibition on Circumvention of Copyright Protection Systems for Access Control Technologies (2024) https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2024/10/28/2024-24563/exemption-to-prohibition-on-circumvention-of-copyright-protection-systems-for-access-control https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2024/10/28/2024-24... https://www.eff.org/issues/dmca-rulemaking https://www.eff.org/issues/dmca-rulemaking
- garbagewoman 11mo agoYou’re breaking the TOS which is a felony according to the CFAA
- aspenmayer 11mo agoSounds like FUD to me. All of the cases I’m familiar with actually say that violating TOS isn’t against CFAA. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Computer_Fraud_and_Abuse_Act https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Computer_Fraud_and_Abuse_Act
- garbagewoman 11mo agoFamiliar with the Aaron Swartz case?
- aspenmayer 11mo agoYes, I’m familiar with the case. He was caught interfering with equipment on the MIT campus in order to additionally violate TOS of JSTOR, wasn’t he? He shouldn’t have expected to prevail in court, and I’m saddened by his decision to end his own life. That said, he did a whole lot more besides violating TOS, so I’m not sure how applicable his case is to the topic under discussion, strictly speaking.
- garbagewoman 11mo agoThe charge of computer fraud was based on the breaking of TOS for MIT and JSTOR
- aspenmayer 11mo ago> The charge of computer fraud was based on the breaking of TOS for MIT and JSTOR He wasn’t convicted, so that’s not been proved to be against the law in this case, so it doesn’t support the argument you’re advancing in this thread.