3 ms·
As a non-designer that's not really an issue for me. There are so many cheap or FOSS design templates, snippets, icons, etc available these days that it's not
by SkyMarshal 14y ago
As a non-designer that's not really an issue for me. There are so many cheap or FOSS design templates, snippets, icons, etc available these days that it's not a huge problem to put together a package of them for Foundation.
I use Bootstrap when
1. the default Bootstrap theme or a third party theme are sufficient
2. I don't need Foundation's better grid system
3. I'm using something other than Ruby (which for me is most of the time)
Foundation for:
1. There's a specific problem that their better grid system solves. I haven't come across this yet, but am aware of it for when/if I do.
2. Client wants a highly customized Ruby-based site with no hint of the Bootstrap look
As someone mentioned above, you can use Foundation and borrow design and/or javascript elements from Bootstrap and elsewhere if you need to go that route.
- chaostheory 14y agoCould be just preference or even skills (my front end skills aren't that great), but I find many generic design templates to be not that great visually or a lot of work to adapt to a css framework like foundation. Time is expensive. I like stuff with batteries included. Given bootstrap's momentum, it even has a plethora of design templates as well so you won't have a generic bootstrap looking site.