> It's extremely uncommon for the court to issue an opinion with such large repercussions. Like Dobbs (Abortion), Bruen (Guns), Students for Fair Admissions (A

> It's extremely uncommon for the court to issue an opinion with such large repercussions. Like Dobbs (Abortion), Bruen (Guns), Students for Fair Admissions (Affirmative Action), Loper Bright, Destruction of the voting rights act, Trump is king, etc This supreme court issues at least one opinion with massive repercussions each term, every term. I simply don't know how you are under the impression that they care about repercussions in the slightest. They don't much care for rationale explanation or precedent either.