3 ms·

thanks for the thorough response. I wonder how profitable it would be if you charged say $5/year. guess its impossible to determine, because gizmodo or gadgt co

thanks for the thorough response. I wonder how profitable it would be if you charged say $5/year. guess its impossible to determine, because gizmodo or gadgt could sign up and destroy your average cost per user.

modernerd 14y ago
Tiered pricing is probably the only sane way to go for exactly the reason you suggest: big sites will use more resources. FeedBlitz, perhaps the only real 'competitor' to FeedBurner at the moment, uses a tiered pricing model linked to the number of email subscribers you have. RSS subscribers are free. So that's one option. There will be others. http://www.feedblitz.com/pricing/ http://www.feedblitz.com/pricing/