3 ms·
I don't understand why Youtube would do this. Both applying these kinds of "enhancements" to video and to do so without consent or even informing people. How is
by bborud 10mo ago
I don't understand why Youtube would do this. Both applying these kinds of "enhancements" to video and to do so without consent or even informing people. How is this a smart move?
We need more people experimenting with creating a better platform for content creators. Not least so people like Beato, but not as well known, don't constantly get harassed by fraudulent and incorrect copyright infringement claims.
- conartist6 10mo agoIt only takes one ambitious person
- onion2k 10mo ago...to drive away the content producers that are key to the platform's success?
- conartist6 10mo agoExactly. I thought it was fun though that the same statement could just as well apply to creating the platform those producers go to.
- cindyllm 10mo ago[dead]
- krapp 10mo agoThe content producers actually bringing in money are all in on AI. Most people on the platform are a net negative for Google.
- krapp 10mo agoThey probably believe these "enhancements" will increase engagement. OR they need to justify the mountain of money they burned on AI somehow. Also there are alternatives to Youtube in the Fediverse like PeerTube.
- stainablesteel 10mo agoyeah it's foolish, the platform should just remain the platform, any attempt at improving engagement should be done by the creators or else this whole system would slowly collapse from frustration and move to a different website
- mannanj 10mo agoIf you make all content look like AI generated content, it normalizes AI generated content more and pushes their AI slop and AI generation products.