4 ms·
I wonder if I got a license plate holder that said 'I do not consent to selling my position information' if I could sue them.
by jmward01 11mo ago
I wonder if I got a license plate holder that said 'I do not consent to selling my position information' if I could sue them.
- 7e 11mo agoYou have no right to privacy in public, at least in the US.
- __del__ 11mo agoclarity is good. i believe that was a reference to the futility of posting "i do not consent" messages on social media.
- edot 11mo agoBut don’t I have a right to not get stalked?
- ecb_penguin 11mo agoYes of course you do. If you're being stalked, contact your local police department.
- diydsp 11mo agoThat is oft-repeated, but case law is starting to show it's not strictly true: See Mosaic + Carpenter case which say “Yes, each scan is public; yes, aggregation is different. " Carpenter shows the Court recognizes that aggregated location data can be constitutionally significant. Individual observability vs. systemic observation: A passerby can note a single plate at a single place/time. But a system of ALPRs, distributed spatially and continuous in time, indexed and retained, can map a person’s entire movements, associations, repeated visits, and behavioral patterns. That’s exactly the “mosaic” insight: the whole reveals things the pieces don’t. (Maynard / Jones reasoning).