3 ms·
That was admittedly hyperbole, but since we're talking about a company with assets and revenue in the billions I'm not sure it matters. The fact remains that a
by autoexec 10mo ago
That was admittedly hyperbole, but since we're talking about a company with assets and revenue in the billions I'm not sure it matters. The fact remains that a lack of money/resources is not their problem.
- evanelias 10mo agoThey don't have unlimited resources. They have ~5000 employees. That's not small but it's not huge either. For sake of comparison, Google hit that headcount level literally 20 years ago.
- autoexec 10mo agoThey have enough money to buy anything they need. The CEO alone has billions. He could pay for as many employees as he wants out of his own pocket and not notice. In fact he's good at buying people, even senators.
- evanelias 10mo agoThat doesn't make sense. It would be like saying Twitter, SpaceX, and Tesla all should be incapable of engineering mistakes because their owner is rich. The world doesn't work that way.