3 ms·
In the sense that most startups, like most enterprises, fail without returning a positive reward to its owners or investors, then yes, I suppose startups do ind
by rexreed 14y ago
In the sense that most startups, like most enterprises, fail without returning a positive reward to its owners or investors, then yes, I suppose startups do indeed look like hobbies.
However, in the sense that a startup is an enterprise, which aims to employ people, seek an exit through acquisition or IPO, or simply to scale to a large profit-driven enterprise, it is not like a hobby. Even if these startups fail, the intent is to create an enterprise that generates return to its shareholders, rather than something done simply for the personal interest or enjoyment of its owners. Of course...
Hobbies of course can become startups, and startups can become hobbies (once they give up on the enterprise aspect). And many startups are indeed run for the personal interest or enjoyment of the startup. So, it's quite possible you can only really identify a startup as a hobby either in the short-term (pre-revenue / pre-success) or in hind-sight (after they have proven to have failed).
Would this make Color a startup or a hobby?
- bjansn 14y agoA startup without any clue on how to make money is an expensive hobby. Color burning it's current capital without any idea on what they're doing as well. The whole first two versions of their product could have been tested in spare time, and sure scaling could be an issue then.
- rprasad 14y agoColor would be a startup, because it has the intention to make money, and has attempted to make money (i.e., through ads). The lack of success is not determinative of whether a venture is a business. However where the line is blurry (i.e., for a business operated out of a home), it could be the factor that tips the scales toward treating the venture as a hobby.