4 ms·
This really doesn't make sense to me. I see no world where Ai is so useful that the common man is willing to pay 100+ a month for it, but it's also a world wher
by thatguy0900 10mo ago
This really doesn't make sense to me. I see no world where Ai is so useful that the common man is willing to pay 100+ a month for it, but it's also a world where the common man has a job. There's too many people for everyone to have some niche job the Ai can't do.
- bojan 10mo agoAnd if such a job would carry a work week of, say, 5 or 10 hours?
- MSFT_Edging 10mo agoThen they would be paid for 5-10 hours and have to ask the government for benefits. In what world would a corporation pay a full yearly salary for 1/8th to 1/4 the labor hours? The current world already looks to labor as the juiciest place to cut cost for the profit margin.
- HPsquared 10mo agoThat's not enough time to maintain skill. Experience would build very slowly in people working so intermittently.
- thatguy0900 10mo agoSomeone is working 20 hours a month and paying for a 100$ subscription on top of bills? And this isn't a isolated case, this is the expectation for the normal person? Is the job supposed to be real or is the government just giving out universal basic income while being petulant about people not working at all
- lm28469 10mo agoThat's not really how it worked out so far, the productivity is simply pocketed by the elite and never translates to shorter work week, salary increase or earlier retirement https://files.epi.org/charts/img/235212-28502-body.png https://files.epi.org/charts/img/235212-28502-body.png