> argued mostly out of people's beliefs and ideology, and changing no one's opinions. With that criterion, we should also flag posts about Apple's patent lawsu

> argued mostly out of people's beliefs and ideology, and changing no one's opinions. With that criterion, we should also flag posts about Apple's patent lawsuits and appstore exclusion disputes :) Nah, but I get your point. I'm really not interested in the average HNer's position on the global warming debate either. Mostly because the few people that actually are very knowledgeable on the topic (there must be a few) won't get the spotlight they deserve (again, criticism of HN's voting system, but it really sucks for cases like these). And of course it's not really a typical "core" topic for HN. But actually quite many posts are not "typical" in the way you'd expect, as long as they provide ground for a fruitful and interesting discussion. Which global warming discussions indeed often do not.