3 ms·

> That's why FDA's OBPV did the follow-up review of those 96 child deaths and concluded >10 were causal from vaccine myocarditis. And we're back at the "Hitler

by ceejayoz 11mo ago

> That's why FDA's OBPV did the follow-up review of those 96 child deaths and concluded >10 were causal from vaccine myocarditis. And we're back at the "Hitler provided free things to Jews" technical truth again. This is likely an accurate statement! But it'd deeply missing important context. > If the conclusion was fake or flimsy, this blows up in their face and RFK looks like a clown. This is likely meaningless to the guy who leaves dead bears in Central Park. The biggest political innovation in the last 50 years or so is the discovery that you can look like a clown without much consequence. > Edit: as for the Tylenol, see this https://x.com/HHSGov/status/1970868168995536978 https://x.com/HHSGov/status/1970868168995536978 I don't recommend eating poop, but that doesn't mean it causes autism.

andreygrehov 11mo ago
Your arguments in a nutshell: 1. Hitler gave Jews free stuff (technical truth used to mislead) 2. Dead bear guy doesn’t care about looking like a clown 3. Therefore the OBPV causality review must be deceptive sleight-of-hand That's literally a conspiracy theory. On Tylenol, FDA did add a "possible association" warning in Sept 2025 (RFK’s call), but even the new label says evidence is only _suggestive_, not proven. Poop analogy fits the anti side better: no, avoiding fever meds won't prevent autism, but it could harm pregnancies. What exactly is the "important context"?
- ceejayoz 11mo ago
  The sleight of hand is pretending ten kids dying of a rare vaccine side effect is at all surprising when we gave it to billions of people. Eating pretzels has a more dangerous safety profile than that. People choke to death.
  - andreygrehov 11mo ago
    Is there a strong evidence that kids need it in the first place? A stricter protocol does not dismiss the kids, right?
    - ceejayoz 11mo ago
      > Is there a strong evidence that kids need it in the first place? https://www.pbs.org/newshour/science/fda-officials-have-said-without-evidence-that-covid-19-vaccines-have-killed-children-heres-what-you-should-know https://www.pbs.org/newshour/science/fda-officials-have-said... "U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention data shows that since the start of the pandemic, more than 2,000 children age 18 and younger in the U.S. have died from COVID-19. Nearly 700, or about 33%, were less than 1 year old." Given the effectiveness at preventing death, I'll happily trade 2,000 COVID deaths for 10 myocarditis deaths.
      - andreygrehov 11mo ago
        Once again, stricter protocols don't dismiss anyone, they adapt to 2025 realities: near-zero child covid deaths monthly vs. rare vax risks. Under the new FDA framework, kids aren't denied shots; they just require a doctor's consult for personalized recs. Your framing sounds like full denial, which is false and amps up the fear.

andreygrehov 11mo ago

Your arguments in a nutshell: 1. Hitler gave Jews free stuff (technical truth used to mislead) 2. Dead bear guy doesn’t care about looking like a clown 3. Therefore the OBPV causality review must be deceptive sleight-of-hand That's literally a conspiracy theory. On Tylenol, FDA did add a "possible association" warning in Sept 2025 (RFK’s call), but even the new label says evidence is only _suggestive_, not proven. Poop analogy fits the anti side better: no, avoiding fever meds won't prevent autism, but it could harm pregnancies. What exactly is the "important context"?

ceejayoz 11mo ago
The sleight of hand is pretending ten kids dying of a rare vaccine side effect is at all surprising when we gave it to billions of people. Eating pretzels has a more dangerous safety profile than that. People choke to death.
- andreygrehov 11mo ago
  Is there a strong evidence that kids need it in the first place? A stricter protocol does not dismiss the kids, right?
  - ceejayoz 11mo ago
    > Is there a strong evidence that kids need it in the first place? https://www.pbs.org/newshour/science/fda-officials-have-said-without-evidence-that-covid-19-vaccines-have-killed-children-heres-what-you-should-know https://www.pbs.org/newshour/science/fda-officials-have-said... "U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention data shows that since the start of the pandemic, more than 2,000 children age 18 and younger in the U.S. have died from COVID-19. Nearly 700, or about 33%, were less than 1 year old." Given the effectiveness at preventing death, I'll happily trade 2,000 COVID deaths for 10 myocarditis deaths.
    - andreygrehov 11mo ago
      Once again, stricter protocols don't dismiss anyone, they adapt to 2025 realities: near-zero child covid deaths monthly vs. rare vax risks. Under the new FDA framework, kids aren't denied shots; they just require a doctor's consult for personalized recs. Your framing sounds like full denial, which is false and amps up the fear.