4 ms·
Hosting web sites on AWS requires EC2, which is basically a VPS. EC2 is probably one of the worst available options if you are looking for UI and reliability. T
by gexla 14y ago
Hosting web sites on AWS requires EC2, which is basically a VPS. EC2 is probably one of the worst available options if you are looking for UI and reliability. The lack of reliability is a feature of EC2 as your instances can just disappear with no warning. I don't know what your requirements are for UI, but EC2 started out as a command line only interface and it's not much better today. EC2 now has a console that you can use to start and stop services, but there is nothing to help you create a working hosting environment.Creating a robust environment for your needs is likely more trouble than it's worth with EC2.
Look into similar services such as Rackspace cloud servers which has similar offerings in a more traditional package. Rackspace also offers managed VPS packages. For your purposes you probably won't need anything more than 512MB or 1GB of RAM.
- justindocanto 14y agoHi Gexla, since making this post... I've discovered a lot of what you've mentioned here. AWS is definitely overkill for what I'm looking for. The UI is not friendly, the purpose behind it are not even what I'm looking for. I didnt realize AWS was delivering such a raw platform, meaning... 'we provide a machine, you do the rest'. That is not what i am looking for by any means. I will check out rackspace & I am looking into other managed server hosting providers as well. I really appreciate your input and thank you so much for the reply =)