Maybe. But by reading his article even if it were a Pareto distribution, his arguments would have been valid. While the pieces of advice he gave are good, the p

Maybe. But by reading his article even if it were a Pareto distribution, his arguments would have been valid. While the pieces of advice he gave are good, the pseudo-scientific explanation behind his intuitions ("The metric probably follows a normal distribution...", "I ran a Monte-Carlo simulation... " baffles me.