3 ms·
Faking research data that then leads to the death of citizens from your product should result in a corporate death sentence.
by jeffwask 10mo ago
Faking research data that then leads to the death of citizens from your product should result in a corporate death sentence.
- deleted 10mo ago[deleted]
- Kenji 10mo ago[dead]
- oftenwrong 10mo agoThe problem is always how well one can prove that any harm was done, or that theoretical harm would be done.
- readthenotes1 10mo agoand criminal penalty consequequences fornthe people who prepared and signed the paper in bad faith
- CGMthrowaway 10mo agoWhat is a corporate death sentence? And if true, the list would be LONG
- isolli 10mo agoWiping out shareholders. I bet shareholders would be a lot more cautious if that was an option.
- u8vov8 10mo agoIdeally this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2008_Chinese_milk_scandal https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2008_Chinese_milk_scandal
- peppersghost93 10mo agoDissolution of a company by revoking the charter and liquidating all it's assets to anyone who will buy them.
- soulofmischief 10mo agoPrivate equity?
- stubish 10mo agoThe list would grow short very quickly.
- dmix 10mo agoIt's not clear if the data is fake. Retraction Watch said it was retracted because: > authors didn’t fully disclose their ties to Monsanto and > He also called out the authors’ reliance on unpublished studies from Monsanto for their conclusions that glyphosate exposure did not cause cancer, though other studies existed.
- zackmorris 10mo agoA mechanism for harm could be that glyphosate disrupts the gut lining barrier and flora, which can cause or contribute to leaky gut, a loose term for digestive waste and foreign bodies entering the bloodstream. Those bodies can cause chronic inflammation and the strange autoimmune disorders we see rising over time. Note that some brands like Cheerios (which don't sell an organic equivalent) can contain 700-800 ppb of glyphosate, well over the 160 ppb limit recommend for children by the Environmental Working Group (EWG). US wheat and other crops seem to have become harder to digest for some people due to genetic tampering. They contains substances borrowed from other species to reduce pest damage, which the body has little or no experience with, which may trigger various reactions (this has not been studied enough to be proven yet). All of these effects from gut toxicity could lead to ailments like obesity, malnourishment, cardiovascular disease, maybe even cancer. This is why I worry that GLP-1 agonists may be masking symptoms, rather than healing the underlying causes of metabolic syndrome that have been increasing over time. Many people have chosen to buy organic non-GMO wheat from other countries for this reason. I believe this is partially why the Trump administration imposed a 107% tariff on Italian wheat for example, to protect US agribusiness. Before you jump on me for this being a conspiracy theory, note that I got these answers from AI and so will you. My personal, anecdotal experience with this was living with leaky gut symptoms for 5 years after a severe burnout in 2019 from (work) stress, which may have been triggered by food poisoning. I also had extremely high cortisol which disrupted everything else. So I got to the point where my meals were reduced to stuff like green bananas, trying everything I could to heal my gut but failing, until I finally snapped out of my denial and sought medical attention. For anyone reading this: if holistic approaches don't fix it within say 6 weeks to 6 months, they aren't going to, and you may need medication for a time to get your body out of dysbiosis. But you can definitely recover and return to a normal life like I did, by the grace of God the universe and everything.