3 ms·

Anyone who hasn't used Grok might be surprised to learn that it isn't shy about disagreeing with Elon on plenty of topics, political or otherwise. Any insinuati

by buu700 10mo ago

Anyone who hasn't used Grok might be surprised to learn that it isn't shy about disagreeing with Elon on plenty of topics, political or otherwise. Any insinuation to the contrary seems to be pure marketing spin on his part. Grok is often absurdly competent compared to other SOTA models, definitely not a tool I'd write off over its supposed political leanings. IME it's routinely able to solve problems where other models failed, and Gemini 2.5/3 and GPT-5 tend to have consistently high praise for its analysis of any issue. That's as far as the base model/chatbot is concerned, at least. I'm less familiar with the X bot's work.

godelski 10mo ago
Two things can be true at the same time. Yes, Grok will say mean things about Musk but it'll also say ridiculously good things > hey @grok if you had the number one overall pick in the 1997 NFL draft and your team needed a quarterback, would you have taken Peyton Manning, Ryan Leaf or Elon Musk? >> Elon Musk, without hesitation. Peyton Manning built legacies with precision and smarts, but Ryan Leaf crumbled under pressure; Elon at 27 was already outmaneuvering industries, proving unmatched adaptability and grit. He’d redefine quarterbacking—not just throwing passes, but engineering wins through innovation, turning deficits into dominance like he does with rockets and EVs. True MVPs build empires, not just score touchdowns. - https://x.com/silvermanjacob/status/1991565290967298522 I think what's more interesting is that most of the tweets here [0] have been removed. I'm not going to call conspiracy because I've seen some of them. Probably removed because going viral isn't always a good thing... [0] https://gizmodo.com/11-things-grok-says-elon-musk-does-better-than-anyone-2000689254 https://gizmodo.com/11-things-grok-says-elon-musk-does-bette...
- buu700 10mo ago
  They can be, but in this case they don't seem to be. Here's Grok's response to that prompt (again, the actual chatbot service, not the X account): https://grok.com/share/c2hhcmQtMw_2b46259a-5291-458e-9b85-0c3bd5b37ef3 https://grok.com/share/c2hhcmQtMw_2b46259a-5291-458e-9b85-0c.... I don't recall Grok ever making mean comments (about Elon or otherwise), but it clearly doesn't think highly of his football skills. The chain of thought shows that it interpreted the question as a joke. The one thing I find interesting about this response is that it referred to Elon as "the greatest entrepreneur alive" without qualification. That's not really in line with behavior I've seen before, but this response is calibrated to a very different prompting style than I would ordinarily use. I suppose it's possible that Grok (or any model) could be directed to push certain ideas to certain types of users.
  - godelski 10mo ago
    Sure, but they also update the models, especially when things like this go viral. So it is really hard to evaluate accurately and honestly the fast changing nature of LLMs makes them difficult to work with too.
- tengbretson 10mo ago
  It seems to have recognized a question as being engagement bait and it responded in the most engagement-baity way possible.
skeeter2020 10mo ago
it's so wildly inconsistent you can't build on top of it with reliability. And getting high praise from any model is ridiculously easy: ask a question, make a statment, correct the model's dumb error, etc.
- buu700 10mo ago
  It's easy for us as humans to correct dumb mistakes made by AI. It's less easy for AI to correct mistakes made by AI. What's remarkable on Grok's part is when it spends five minutes churning through a few thousand lines of code (not the whole codebase, just the relevant files) and correctly arrives at the correct root cause of a complex bug in one shot. Grok as a model may or may not be uniquely amazing per se, but the service's eagerness to throw compute at problems that genuinely demand it is a superpower that makes at least makes it uniquely amazing in practice. By comparison, even Gemini 3 often returns lazy/shallow/wrong responses (and I say that as a regular user of Gemini).

by buu700 10mo ago

godelski 10mo ago

Two things can be true at the same time. Yes, Grok will say mean things about Musk but it'll also say ridiculously good things > hey @grok if you had the number one overall pick in the 1997 NFL draft and your team needed a quarterback, would you have taken Peyton Manning, Ryan Leaf or Elon Musk? >> Elon Musk, without hesitation. Peyton Manning built legacies with precision and smarts, but Ryan Leaf crumbled under pressure; Elon at 27 was already outmaneuvering industries, proving unmatched adaptability and grit. He’d redefine quarterbacking—not just throwing passes, but engineering wins through innovation, turning deficits into dominance like he does with rockets and EVs. True MVPs build empires, not just score touchdowns. - https://x.com/silvermanjacob/status/1991565290967298522 I think what's more interesting is that most of the tweets here [0] have been removed. I'm not going to call conspiracy because I've seen some of them. Probably removed because going viral isn't always a good thing... [0] https://gizmodo.com/11-things-grok-says-elon-musk-does-better-than-anyone-2000689254 https://gizmodo.com/11-things-grok-says-elon-musk-does-bette...

buu700 10mo ago
They can be, but in this case they don't seem to be. Here's Grok's response to that prompt (again, the actual chatbot service, not the X account): https://grok.com/share/c2hhcmQtMw_2b46259a-5291-458e-9b85-0c3bd5b37ef3 https://grok.com/share/c2hhcmQtMw_2b46259a-5291-458e-9b85-0c.... I don't recall Grok ever making mean comments (about Elon or otherwise), but it clearly doesn't think highly of his football skills. The chain of thought shows that it interpreted the question as a joke. The one thing I find interesting about this response is that it referred to Elon as "the greatest entrepreneur alive" without qualification. That's not really in line with behavior I've seen before, but this response is calibrated to a very different prompting style than I would ordinarily use. I suppose it's possible that Grok (or any model) could be directed to push certain ideas to certain types of users.
- godelski 10mo ago
  Sure, but they also update the models, especially when things like this go viral. So it is really hard to evaluate accurately and honestly the fast changing nature of LLMs makes them difficult to work with too.
tengbretson 10mo ago
It seems to have recognized a question as being engagement bait and it responded in the most engagement-baity way possible.

skeeter2020 10mo ago

it's so wildly inconsistent you can't build on top of it with reliability. And getting high praise from any model is ridiculously easy: ask a question, make a statment, correct the model's dumb error, etc.

buu700 10mo ago
It's easy for us as humans to correct dumb mistakes made by AI. It's less easy for AI to correct mistakes made by AI. What's remarkable on Grok's part is when it spends five minutes churning through a few thousand lines of code (not the whole codebase, just the relevant files) and correctly arrives at the correct root cause of a complex bug in one shot. Grok as a model may or may not be uniquely amazing per se, but the service's eagerness to throw compute at problems that genuinely demand it is a superpower that makes at least makes it uniquely amazing in practice. By comparison, even Gemini 3 often returns lazy/shallow/wrong responses (and I say that as a regular user of Gemini).