4 ms·
Why don't they use DisplayPort 2.1? It's just superior. Why stick to HDMI? No wonder why Apple took DisplayPort-Mini port for their Thunderbolt interface. Back
by deepsun 11mo ago
Why don't they use DisplayPort 2.1? It's just superior. Why stick to HDMI?
No wonder why Apple took DisplayPort-Mini port for their Thunderbolt interface. Back in 2011!
- gh02t 11mo agoPresumably because most people want to plug it into a TV, and supporting both would add cost.
- thfuran 11mo agoI'd buy a SteamTV that's a good panel with a decent soc, DP instead of HDMI, and no webshit.
- giancarlostoro 11mo agoAn no “Smart” bullshit, just a good device that syncs up to all your gaming devices.
- deleted 11mo ago[deleted]
- giancarlostoro 11mo agoCall me ignorant and feel free to correct me but I thought DisplayPort didnt support audio?
- cweagans 11mo agoDisplayPort 1.1 and above supports audio transmission.
- Telaneo 11mo agoDP supports audio just fine. It just isn't usually used for that, since it's used with monitors and not TVs.
- troupo 10mo ago> It just isn't usually used for that, since it's used with monitors and not TVs. Monitors have had audio outputs since forever, and now most displays these days are also USB hubs to boot.
- sevensor 11mo ago> players that want to avoid the issue can use the Steam Machine’s DisplayPort 1.4 output, which supports even more bandwidth than HDMI 2.1 (and which can be converted to an HDMI signal with a simple dongle). Looks like users can do just that.
- ThatPlayer 11mo ago> DisplayPort 1.4 output, which supports even more bandwidth than HDMI 2.1 That's pretty wrong isn't it? HDMI 2.1 does 48 Gigabit/s. DP 1.4 is ~26 Gigabit/s. I think they meant to compared it to HDMI 2.0 @ 15 Gigabit/s?
- yesco 10mo agoAre you aware of any new TVs that have a displayport? Genuinely asking since I haven't been very successful finding any.