4 ms·
What Russian war crimes? While the US commits nothing but war crimes.
by SanjayMehta 11mo ago
What Russian war crimes?
While the US commits nothing but war crimes.
- cosmicgadget 11mo agoYou can be anti-west without being a Putin apologist.
- SanjayMehta 11mo agoIn 1971, when the war criminals Nixon and Kissinger tried to STOP India from intervening in the genocide in East Pakistan, it was the USSR which helped us rescue millions and create the country of Bangladesh. Russia on the other hand never tried to invade India, despite the Russophobic British spreading lies since they got a whooping in the Crimean war in 1856. [0] As for the famines caused by the British in India, and the utterly vile conversions executed by the portoguese in Goa using industrial tools like breast-rippers, the less said the better. [1] [0] https://academic.oup.com/psq/article-abstract/66/4/618/7251604?login=false https://academic.oup.com/psq/article-abstract/66/4/618/72516... [1] https://wikibharat.org/pages/francis_xavier_and_inquisition_of_goa/ https://wikibharat.org/pages/francis_xavier_and_inquisition_... I suggest you stop regurgitating propaganda.
- mopsi 11mo agoIn Eastern Europe, the USSR acted like the British in India, and Russia continues that tradition.
- SanjayMehta 11mo agoEastern Europe collaborated with the Nazis to attack the USSR. You may not know your own history but I do. Case in point: The Ukraine (Stepan Bandera) and Poland. Look it up.
- cosmicgadget 11mo agoDon't the Soviets get the mark of death for collaborating with the Nazis to divide Poland? Did any part of India do anything objectionable pre-occupation such that you could apply the same "they had it coming" argument?
- mopsi 11mo agoThe USSR had starved millions of Ukrainians to death before the Nazis even rose to power. Mirrors the British hunger games in India. If you want to excuse and trivialize the suffering caused by Russians in Eastern Europe, then by the same token you trivialize the suffering of Indians under British rule. All the same excuses apply: some Bandera-Ramachandran surely conspired against the British and therefore the Bengal famine is your own fault.
- SanjayMehta 11mo agoI've read both version of the Holodomor or whatever it's called. I put it down to communist incompetence, Mao was no different than Stalin in this regard. As for the famines in India, the war criminal Churchill deliberately routed grains to feed his armies during world war 2. Prior to that, it was British policy to trigger famines, not incompetence. During the Irish famine, again under British rule, the latter were exporting grains and other produce to England. It was not incompetence but malice. Who is Ramachandran?
- mopsi 11mo agoThe USSR was also exporting grains as their own people were starving. Churchill said that the Indian famines were the fault of Indians for "breeding like rabbits" and Stalin said that the Holodomor was the fault of Ukrainians for being "kulak saboteurs". The same dismissive and inhumane attitude shines through. They knew what was happening, they knew that they had the means to stop it, and they chose not to use them.
- SanjayMehta 11mo agoChurchill was a shameless genocidal racist. While he was saying that, he was exporting grain to feed his armies. I'm glad to see that you view the two - Churchill and Stalin - as equally evil.
- SanjayMehta 11mo agoAlso, better to be a "Putin apologist" than a liar - like most Western politicians.
- cosmicgadget 11mo agoAre Eastern politicians notoriously honest?
- SanjayMehta 11mo agoYes. Especially compared to the Westerners.
- deleted 11mo ago[deleted]