3 ms·

What if the problem they were facing on Twitter was that others weren't doing their part in the open and transparent discussion?

scottyah 11mo ago
How would it not be open and transparent on twitter? It's a site where everyone can see what they are talking about. It's only when they try to limit to whom and where they talk to people that they are not open and transparent.
- lcnPylGDnU4H9OF 11mo ago
  > How would it not be open and transparent on twitter? Lying. Trolling. Bullshitting. Stonewalling. > It's only when they try to limit to whom and where they talk to people that they are not open and transparent. I don't need to talk to you or use your favored public platform for my published material to be open and transparent on some other public platform.
  - scottyah 11mo ago
    > Lying. Trolling. Bullshitting. Stonewalling. What do these have to do with open and transparent communication? > I don't need to talk to you or use your favored public platform for my published material to be open and transparent on some other public platform. Very true, but limiting the platforms limits the openness and transparency. With some simple software you can post to all with almost no effort. Seems weird to disclude one just to write a blog post about it for attention.
    - lcnPylGDnU4H9OF 11mo ago
      > What do these have to do with open and transparent communication? If I'm lying to you, I'm being neither open nor transparent, by definition. > Very true, but limiting the platforms limits the openness and transparency. It only limits the audience who will see it incidentally. Anyone who's looking for it can still find it. > With some simple software you can post to all with almost no effort. I rather suspect that they are avoiding the platform for reasons other than the effort it takes to simply create a post. This seems moot in context.

scottyah 11mo ago

How would it not be open and transparent on twitter? It's a site where everyone can see what they are talking about. It's only when they try to limit to whom and where they talk to people that they are not open and transparent.

lcnPylGDnU4H9OF 11mo ago
> How would it not be open and transparent on twitter? Lying. Trolling. Bullshitting. Stonewalling. > It's only when they try to limit to whom and where they talk to people that they are not open and transparent. I don't need to talk to you or use your favored public platform for my published material to be open and transparent on some other public platform.
- scottyah 11mo ago
  > Lying. Trolling. Bullshitting. Stonewalling. What do these have to do with open and transparent communication? > I don't need to talk to you or use your favored public platform for my published material to be open and transparent on some other public platform. Very true, but limiting the platforms limits the openness and transparency. With some simple software you can post to all with almost no effort. Seems weird to disclude one just to write a blog post about it for attention.
  - lcnPylGDnU4H9OF 11mo ago
    > What do these have to do with open and transparent communication? If I'm lying to you, I'm being neither open nor transparent, by definition. > Very true, but limiting the platforms limits the openness and transparency. It only limits the audience who will see it incidentally. Anyone who's looking for it can still find it. > With some simple software you can post to all with almost no effort. I rather suspect that they are avoiding the platform for reasons other than the effort it takes to simply create a post. This seems moot in context.