The Economist should not be treated as reliable source of information on medical issues. [edit] To be more specific, this is a lazy take and is about as insigh

The Economist should not be treated as reliable source of information on medical issues. [edit] To be more specific, this is a lazy take and is about as insightful as saying 'cancer should not be treated as a single condition' which for HN is about as meaningful as saying 'the CPU and the GPU may both contain chips, but they should not be programmed the same.'