4 ms·
There's over twice as much content in the first test. It's around 3.8gb/s vs 30gb/s if you divide both folder size and both du durations. That makes it 7.9 time
by simlevesque 10mo ago
There's over twice as much content in the first test. It's around 3.8gb/s vs 30gb/s if you divide both folder size and both du durations. That makes it 7.9 times faster and I'm comfortable calling this "almost 10 times".
- adgjlsfhk1 10mo agooops. I missed the size diff. that's a solid 8x. that's cool!
- ls65536 10mo agoThe total size isn't what matters in this case but rather the total number of files/directories that need to be traversed (and their file sizes summed).
- simlevesque 10mo agoI responded here, it's essentially the same content: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46150030 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46150030