4 ms·

> two versions of the same phone with different processors That's hilarious, which phone is this?

by morcus 10mo ago

namibj 10mo ago
Several high end Galaxy S's AFAIK.
grincek 10mo ago
This is the case as recent as of S24, phones can come with exynos or snapdragon, with exynos usually featuring worse performance and battery life
petcat 10mo ago
Basically every Galaxy phone comes in two versions. One with Exynos and one with Snapdragon. It's regional though. US always gets the Snapdragon phones while Europe and mostly Asia gets the Exynos version. My understanding is that the Exynos is inferior in a lot of ways, but also cheaper.
- sgerenser 10mo ago
  In the past using Snapdragon CPUs for the U.S. made sense due to Qualcomm having much better support for the CDMA frequencies needed by Verizon. Probably no longer relevant since the 5G transition though.
muvlon 10mo ago
Not one phone, they did this all over the place. Their flagship line did this starting with the Galaxy S7 all the way up to Galaxy S24. Only the most recent Galaxy S25 is Qualcomm Snapdragon only, supposedly because their own Exynos couldn't hit volume production fast enough.
- noisem4ker 10mo ago
  The S23 too was Snapdragon only, allegedly to let the Exynos team catch some breath and come up with something competitive for the following generation. Which they partly did, as the Exynos S24 is almost on par with its Snapdragon brother. A bit worse on photo and gaming performance, a bit better in web browsing, from the benchmarks I remember.
- magicalhippo 10mo ago
  The S23 was also Snapdragon-only as far as I know[1]. The S24 had the dual chips again, while as you say S25 is Qualcomm only once more. [1]: https://www.androidauthority.com/samsung-exynos-versus-snapdragon-3098401/ https://www.androidauthority.com/samsung-exynos-versus-snapd...
- numpad0 10mo ago
  "Galaxy S II" and its aesthetics was already a mere branding shared across at least four different phones with different SoCs, before counting in sub-variants that share same SoCs. This isn't unique to Samsung, nor is it a new phenomenon, just how consumer products are made and sold. 1: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_S_II https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_S_II
intrikate 10mo ago
I might be out of date, but last I knew, it was "most of them." International models tended to use Samsung's Exynos processors, while the ones for the North American market used Snapdragons or whatever.

> two versions of the same phone with different processors That's hilarious, which phone is this?

by morcus 10mo ago

> two versions of the same phone with different processors That's hilarious, which phone is this?

namibj 10mo ago

Several high end Galaxy S's AFAIK.

grincek 10mo ago

This is the case as recent as of S24, phones can come with exynos or snapdragon, with exynos usually featuring worse performance and battery life

petcat 10mo ago

Basically every Galaxy phone comes in two versions. One with Exynos and one with Snapdragon. It's regional though. US always gets the Snapdragon phones while Europe and mostly Asia gets the Exynos version. My understanding is that the Exynos is inferior in a lot of ways, but also cheaper.

sgerenser 10mo ago
In the past using Snapdragon CPUs for the U.S. made sense due to Qualcomm having much better support for the CDMA frequencies needed by Verizon. Probably no longer relevant since the 5G transition though.

muvlon 10mo ago

Not one phone, they did this all over the place. Their flagship line did this starting with the Galaxy S7 all the way up to Galaxy S24. Only the most recent Galaxy S25 is Qualcomm Snapdragon only, supposedly because their own Exynos couldn't hit volume production fast enough.

noisem4ker 10mo ago
The S23 too was Snapdragon only, allegedly to let the Exynos team catch some breath and come up with something competitive for the following generation. Which they partly did, as the Exynos S24 is almost on par with its Snapdragon brother. A bit worse on photo and gaming performance, a bit better in web browsing, from the benchmarks I remember.
magicalhippo 10mo ago
The S23 was also Snapdragon-only as far as I know[1]. The S24 had the dual chips again, while as you say S25 is Qualcomm only once more. [1]: https://www.androidauthority.com/samsung-exynos-versus-snapdragon-3098401/ https://www.androidauthority.com/samsung-exynos-versus-snapd...
numpad0 10mo ago
"Galaxy S II" and its aesthetics was already a mere branding shared across at least four different phones with different SoCs, before counting in sub-variants that share same SoCs. This isn't unique to Samsung, nor is it a new phenomenon, just how consumer products are made and sold. 1: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_S_II https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_S_II

intrikate 10mo ago

I might be out of date, but last I knew, it was "most of them." International models tended to use Samsung's Exynos processors, while the ones for the North American market used Snapdragons or whatever.